|
|
Home » Personal Creations
Personal Creations coupons & deals
Personal Creations offers hundreds of unique gift items that are custom-made, especially for you. Personalized gifts say a lot. Now it's easy for you to find the perfect one. Personal Creations also offers elegant gift wrapping and your own personalized gift message.
About "Personal Creations" Answer
|
 |
If the languages you speak &write R not your *personalcreation, what makes U thinkyour views of the world? |
|
you live in is entirely a very
private affair?
*(you learned it during your
socialization in the early
years)
I ask this Q bec I saw this
answer picked as a Best
Answer:
Best Answer - Chosen by Asker
I have a notion that every
person lives in his or her
"own little world".
Every individual interacts
with & perceives the world
differently; and therefore,
every individual would define
"the world" differently. We
carry this microcosm with
us--imagine that each
individual is surrounded by a
large "bubble" that contains
his miniature reality. When
people are close to us, their
bubble overlaps ours. Their
sense of "the real" is most
similar to ours.
By my way of thinking,
therefore, it is not possible
for anyone to "truly", or
*universally* exist. If I
don't know Tom, Tom does not,
in my world, exist. True, he
exists in *his* world, but
that is irrelevant to me.
So, no, it is not necessary to
be perceived. The invisible
person would still exist,but
only in his own cognizance.
The BA was posted to this Q:
Is it necessary to be
perceived in order to truly
exist?
It is solipsistic and
relativistic and ignores so
many facts about language and
thought, that I won't even
bother to point them out,(and
the Q&A format prohits it),but
I'd like to know what
cognitive psychologists and
learned persons think of the
relation betwee the self a,the
world around the self and the
nature of language and
thought. |
 |
I don't know what slippingism
is, but what if we're only
partly wrong anyway? Lets
assume we have a theory and
someone has another one partly
right. Then we possibly could
see a thesis, antithesis and
maybe a synthesis down the
road, by holding both views in
our head at the same time,
sort of three dimension of the
brain as the eyes see three
dimensions by looking at two
slightly different views at
once. Try it. It's a weird
feeling sometimes. We may
never see the exact
information again from that
perspective of ever be able to
get back in time to see
exactly the same thing. That
makes truth relatively
relative. That makes us able
to relate to other people and
respect them. I thought that
was proved and now, it's not
again? Even if we're right we
may never need that
information again as a new
picture would be more up to
date. Otherwise we live in the
past and aren't dealing with
now, or may not be. How could
it happen again and even if it
could is it scientific to have
a closed mind? Life is a
process and not a conclusion.
Death is.
The tension of never knowing
exactly could be said to give
us relative progress in always
wanting to know or life might
get boring. Are we bored?
Cynical? Not to happy? Don't
do that well with people? Hm.
That could be the results of
our viewpoint being the
absolute correct one. Does
that have to work one hundred
percent to be worth knowing?
Conclusions are mostly good in
the movies. Science has
avoided life for the very
reason of it's complexity.
Uncomfortable not 'knowing'.
Saying one side is right is
like saying only one side of a
coin exists We may have a
right and left hemisphere to
get two perspectives so that
we can see two sides at once
so we can thesis, antithesis,
synthesis and grow.
Do we have to be superior all
the time? How about there are
some things on which we are
higher and other person have
things on which they are
higher so we all are, on
average equal to each other
and don't need ego and
disrespect. Ego is like
sitting on the scale. The
measurement will seldom equal
reality or be too useful. As a
matter of fact all the
problems in the world are from
this taking of sides instead
of relating. There comes that
word relative again.
Everything relates to
everything else. I see life as
absolutes and paradoxes, which
may take time to resolve and
shouldn't come between us.
Can't we live with that? I've
worked on what I thought was a
profound philosophical
question only to see a
'common' 'ignorant' person's
life was the answer and I
couldn't look anymore to see
all the answers as it was too
complicated. How is that? The
conscious mind is about a
million times slower than
intuition, sometimes called
common sense or speed
thinking. That's useful. |
|
|
|
how does personal creativeachievement relate to God'screations in Genesis? |
|
|
|
God is the creator. He gives
each one talent according to
his desires and abilities.
zainlamedbethe |
|
|
|
What is your own personaltheory on the creation of theuniverse? |
|
My idea was the big bang was
caused by the implosion of a
black hole from another
universe in to ours resulting
in the big bang. Possibly an
ongoing process from one
universe to another. Think
about it....scientist believe
that the gravity of a black
hole is so strong that
everything gets crushed down
to the point of a singularity.
The laws of physics are pretty
much just shot at this point.
The electrons and protons
destroy each other, and then
the neutrally charged neutron
cores are crushed under the
intest gravity. Maybe at this
point where atoms are being
destroyed, maybe it's possible
that they are creating another
universe somewhere else. Just
an idea. I'd love to hear
everyone elses. |
|
Yes, yes, anything is possible
with black holes. From from
Hawking radiation, to
singularities, to the
information paradox, the
mechanics of a black hole are
astounding and have trumped
physicists for years. From a
Christian standpoint, i
believe God plays a large role
in this. However, from a
merely scientific angle, I
feel that the Big Bang was the
start of our universe. This is
evident by many factors, such
as CMBr and CNBr, and many
equations also suggest this.
On the other hand, I am still
confused as to what happened
before this. I always thought
that other universes and
dimensions could be created
within singularities, and
maybe our black holes create
billions of other universes
and dimensions. Some people
may find this idea to be
outrageous, but who are they
to say? No one is sure about
the inner-workings of a black
hole, and possibly anything is
possible. Maybe the concept of
a black hole is too much for
even the most complex
astrophysicists to fathom. Who
knows? Our own universe may
have been created in the same
fashion, and possibly every
universe is created in the
exact same manner, in
different dimensions, at
different times. It may be a
repeating cycle of parallel
universe recycling that had no
beginning, nor does it posses
an end. Possibly, our current
laws of physics are too
corrupted...and maybe we don't
even know it. There are plenty
of unexplainable scientific
phenomena that our knowledge
may not be able to comprehend
with our current laws. It is
likely that the mistakes in
our laws of physics make it
impossible for us to explain
the pre-Big Bang universe.
This is definitely a
possibility, and we may never
know.
Hope that helps. |
|
|
|
See All Stores
